Criminology & Public Policy 10(1)

Editorial Introduction

Confronting crime with science
Thomas G. Blomberg

Executive Summary

Overview of "Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced?"
Steven N. Durlauf and Daniel S. Nagin

Research Article

Imprisonment and crime : Can both be reduced?
Steven N. Durlauf and Daniel S. Nagin

Policy Essays

Thoughts from Pennsylvania on “Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced?”
Mark H. Bergstrom

Reducing crime through prevention not incarceration
William J. Bratton

The challenges of implementing research-based policies
Marc Mauer

More police, less prison, less crime? From peel to popper : The case for more scientific policing
Peter W. Neyroud

Exploring certainty and severity : Perspectives from a federal perch
Laurie O. Robinson

Approaches to reducing both imprisonment and crime
Alfred Blumstein

Coproduction in deterring crime
Philip J. Cook

On the pitfalls of spurious prudence
Elliott Currie

Optimistic deterrence theorizing : The role of timeliness, court dysfunction, and community alienation
John S. Goldkamp

Extraordinary sentences and the proposed police surge
Marie Gottschalk

Less imprisonment is no doubt a good thing : More policing is not
Michael Tonry

Shifting crime and justice resources from prisons to police : Shifting police from people to places
David Weisburd

Comment on Durlauf and Nagin
James Q. Wilson

Uncertainty about reduced severity, concerns about increased certainty, and alternative paths to lower rates of crime and imprisonment
Eric P. Baumer

Laudable goals: Practical hurdles
Dick Thornburgh

Deterrence, Economics, and the Context of Drug Markets
Shawn D. Bushway and Peter Reuter

Afterword

Al Capone, the Sword of Damocles, and the Police–Corrections Budget Ratio : Afterword to the Special Issue
Lawrence W. Sherman

Criminology & Public Policy, February 2011: Volume 10, Issue 1